Natural Disaster :: Earthquakes, Tornados, Flood

Debris is scattered for miles, houses atomic number 18 destroyed, trees are bent, and vehicles have been thrown. This would be an aftermath of a natural disaster. Natural disasters come in many forms such as earthquakes, tornados, floods, blizzards, fires, and volcanic eruptions, just to name a few. Every suit of disaster is not subjected to one specific area. This means that people in certain areas only have to prepare for those disasters that are likely to occur in their region. Throughout the world, natural hazards are a frequent occurrence. On a range of scales they create disaster, destruction and deaths of people. A natural process only becomes a natural hazard when the risk of human loss is presented. (Page 2)An earthquake is a sudden shake of the Earths crust caused by the tectonic plates colliding. (Page 2) The vibrations whitethorn vary in magnitude. The underground point of origin of the earthquake is called the focus. The point directly above the focus on the surfa ce is called the epicenter.(Page 3) Earthquakes by themselves rarely kill people or wildlife. It is usually the secondary events that they trigger, such as building collapse, fires, tsunamis and volcanoes, that are actually the human disaster. (Page 5) Earthquakes may last only a few seconds or may continue for up to several minutes. They can occur at any time of the day or night and at any time of the year. They are caused by stress that builds up over time as blocks of crust attempt to move but are held in place by rubbing along a fault.(Page 8) When the pressure becomes stronger than the friction holding them together, adjoining blocks of crust can suddenly slip, rupturing the fault and creating an earthquake.(Page 10)Volcanoes can cause widespread destruction through several ways. The effects include the volcanic eruption itself that may cause harm following the explosion of the volcano or the fall of rock. Second, lava may be produced during the eruption of a volcano. As i t leaves the volcano the lava destroys any buildings and plants it encounters. Third, volcanic ash generally meaning the cooled ash - may form a cloud, and settle obtusely in nearby locations.(Page 14) The main killer of humans in the immediate surroundings of a volcanic eruption is the pyroclastic flows, which consist of a cloud of fiery volcanic ash which builds up in the air above the volcano and rushes down the slopes when the eruption no longer supports the lifting of the gases.

We Must Stop Legislation to Ban Cell Phone Use While Driving :: Argumentative Persuasive Argument Essays

Cell phones began with only a select few could afford a cellphone phone. Today with most Americans owning cell phones we must regard at the benefits and downfalls of cellular technology. The issue of driving while dialing meets up the most controversy. The legislation in place to govern the use of cellular phones in certain cities is justified, but the benefits far outweigh the disadvantages.The cell phone has been around since the fifties when they front had the idea from using CB radio frequencies. AT&T was the first to bring about the technology back in the late forties and early fifties. The FCC regulated all radio frequencies broadcast and limited AT&T to cardinal phone blazon outs simultaneously in the same service bea. In the seventies the FCC later allowed more use of the radio waves. In the late seventies the first trials were made in Chicago with 2000 initial customers (Bellis 1). In the 1987 cellular customers hit one million. Today one half of the people living in the unite States own a cell phone. It is true that drivers can be clearly distracted from the road from cellular phones. Drivers will have them in a billfold in the backseat or in an inaccessible pocket that they will be startled to get to when someone calls. Drivers will struggle to get to the phone in a timely manner and that becomes their priority instead of the road in front of them. Drivers may swerve or cut off another driver in while trying to answer a cell phone or trying dialing a ten digit telephone number. An Ohio insurance political party took a poll of eight hundred drivers. The results of the poll are as follows 43% said they had accelerated on at least one affair while using their mobile phone 23% said they had tailgated 18% said they had cut someone off 10% ran a red argus-eyed and 41% said they had accelerated to get away from someone else in another vehicle on a mobile phone (Ropeik 16). It is obvious that cell phones are a distraction but are the distracti ons caused by cell phones outweighed by the security and added convenience of a cell phone?There are hundreds of benefits from cellular phones. The convenience more than anything is what appeals to most users. Cell phones can be used for work or for personal use. Businessmen and women will use them to call clients and parents will use them to check on the babysitter.

Alcohol :: essays research papers

Should alcoholic beverage production, bargain, and consumption be prohibited? I think not. For hundreds of years, man has had choices choices pertaining their food intake, their documentation quarters, and their life mates. Whether or not to consume alcohol has been a choice that man has had through late(a) history and is a choice which I conceptualise should remain just that a choice.There has been only one period of history where alcohol purchase and consumption was limited. During the 1920s, specifically 1920 to 1933 (and 1917 to 1919 in Canada) beverages such as beer, gin, rum, whiskey, and wine were forbidden to manufacture, sell, or transport. Supporters of prohibition believed alcoholic beverages endangered mental and physical health (World halt Encyclopedia).Results of the Volstead Act, passed by Congress that enforced prohibition, were disastrous. Underworld gangs controlled the sale of alcohol in communities. Was this a sign of well-grounded mental or physical hea lth?During prohibition, the terms of this illegal alcohol skyrocketed costing people hundreds of dollars. I know what causes unsatisfactory mental health for me and that is having less money in my pocket. If this was such a good idea, why did Congress reverse it?Sure in that respect will always be irresponsible people. And absolutely the irresponsible use of alcohol has produced disastrous results. save look at me. Im a responsible person. When I drink I always make sure that I have a designated driver. Why should I be punished by the few who cant handle that responsibility? How about my grandpargonnts? They believe in having a meth of wine with their dinner. Its an old family custom which has maintained by my generation. Should I be told what I can and cant drink?I was reading duration Magazine recently and a recent employment has been released which states that a glass of wine a day has been shown to improve liver function, lower cholesterol and lessen the chance of heart di sease (Time June 1999). Now if alcohol sale or production was abolished, how could have that study been done. Especially in this decade when heart problems are at an all-time racy due to the high availability of high cholesterol foods, I say you do anything you can do to help.Alcohol essays research papers Should alcohol production, sale, and consumption be prohibited? I think not. For hundreds of years, man has had choices choices pertaining their food intake, their living quarters, and their life mates. Whether or not to consume alcohol has been a choice that man has had through recent history and is a choice which I believe should remain just that a choice.There has been only one period of history where alcohol purchase and consumption was limited. During the 1920s, specifically 1920 to 1933 (and 1917 to 1919 in Canada) beverages such as beer, gin, rum, whiskey, and wine were forbidden to manufacture, sell, or transport. Supporters of prohibition believed alcoholic beverag es endangered mental and physical health (World Book Encyclopedia).Results of the Volstead Act, passed by Congress that enforced prohibition, were disastrous. Underworld gangs controlled the sale of alcohol in communities. Was this a sign of good mental or physical health?During prohibition, the cost of this illegal alcohol skyrocketed costing people hundreds of dollars. I know what causes unsatisfactory mental health for me and that is having less money in my pocket. If this was such a good idea, why did Congress reverse it?Sure there will always be irresponsible people. And absolutely the irresponsible use of alcohol has produced disastrous results. But look at me. Im a responsible person. When I drink I always make sure that I have a designated driver. Why should I be punished by the few who cant handle that responsibility? How about my grandparents? They believe in having a glass of wine with their dinner. Its an old family custom which has maintained by my generation. Should I be told what I can and cant drink?I was reading Time Magazine recently and a recent study has been released which states that a glass of wine a day has been shown to improve liver function, lower cholesterol and lessen the chance of heart disease (Time June 1999). Now if alcohol sale or production was abolished, how could have that study been done. Especially in this decade when heart problems are at an all-time high due to the high availability of high cholesterol foods, I say you do anything you can do to help.